As a fairly average family based in the UK, we owned 2 cars due to my need for a works vehicle. It was 2004 at the time. My wife’s car was a Mk 1 Renault Scenic (dreadfully unreliable, check out the persistent coil pack problems on Parkers forum if you have the time). I owned a Fiat Marea Weekend 1.8SX for work, which was a super car for the money, and certainly the best looking used estate car I found. I bought mine for £1550.00 in 2003 and was able to drive around in a low mileage fairly new (X reg) which in silver looked presentable enough to take clients in.

As the Scenic deteriorated, I got cold feet about it, and decided that rather than running two very similar sized cars, I’d do some research into other estate cars and MPVs (multi purpose vehicles) as well as small hatchbacks, to enable us to own two very different vehicles. The Fiat and the Renault were very similar indeed – it was like owning two estate cars.
Time to pour over the car reports
So myself and another car enthusiast friend sat down and spent several enjoyable evenings simply working out what we needed from our cars, how much we had to spend, and what are choices were. We ruled out anything unreliable (as per the Reliability Index results, where ALL Renaults are listed as poor). To be honest, this is one of my favourite parts of finding a new car. It’s a bit like a chase. I decided I prefered the multi-purpose nature and ‘intelligent design’ of the clever MPVs over a straight estate car. Many of the estates featured overly large bonnets and rear overhangs, and the more I looked at the design of the MPVs – with the body built on a flat floor with everything else tucked away underneath, often giving you a straight walk-through floor, ideal for families, or for when I would carry a large amount of work equipment with tripods stands ladders etc. I was sold on an MPV.
However, I had some misgivings about the offerings in my price bracket (by this stage we’d firmed up our budget: around £4000 for the ‘big car’ option, and around £2000 for the small hatch), so I was now harbouring some firmer thoughts…
  • Mitsubishi Space Wagon – I loved the Battlestar Gallactica looks of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, but had to rule it out on the basis that the average repair bill was £661.00 based on the Reliability Index’s findings.
  • Vauxhall Zafira – I disliked the blandness and ‘follow my leader’ popularity of the Vauxhall Zafira. OK, the fold down seats are clever, but I’d owned an Astra TDi and found it truly forgettable to own, and drive.
  • Ford Galaxy / Seat Alhambra / VW Sharan – Again, the curvy old school ‘Ford Mondeo’ looks of the Mk1 shape looked a bit, well, a bit old hat. The earliest ones now looked very tired indeed, and anyone seen driving one seemed to have an air of desparation around them, like they were borrowing it, but would never admit to owning one. Not even the VW badge could sway me.
  • Toyota Estima / Lucida – I ruled these out quickly after driving one. They have a very lethargic ‘old school van’ feel. Really, they’re an antiquated design now circa 1980′s, and the thirsty Japanese diesel mated to an automatic gearbox means not only that progress can be a little jerky, but that you’ll be lucky to get 25/30mpg in normal use. OK, they have their uses, but they’re far from refined, or efficient, two things high on my list of requirements.
  • Mazda Bongo / Ford Friendee – I was sooo close to choosing this. So I tried one. I loved the idea of owning a car which you could free camp in whenever you wanted; it’s pop top was ingenious: as a design feature it was absolutely brilliant. I loved it! But my dream was dropped from a great height when I drove it. It was fully automatic – a lumpy noisy wheezy thing at low or high speed, and that old tech Jap diesel was torquey but boy was it thirsty! I reckon it was doing 25-30mpg. Yikes. I had a figure in my head I wanted from my MPV, and it was at least 40mpg. The thing was narrow too, built for Jap roads, and the cabin which design-wise should have all swiveled to make it into a camper, didn’t, so the front was all dead space, and the mid and rear seats wouldn’t go down flat, so it made a very unsatisfactory sleeping area. The front seats are fixed forwards with the noisy engine underneath. Much too uncivilised to drive up to London at the drop of a hat, or Bristol even. I couldn’t imagine myself really using for work, it was like a van, and what finally killed the idea was that most of them are 4×4, which would be truly pointless for me. One of my pet hates is wasted energy, and we all know the wasted energy 4x4s are guilty of, pootling round shiney clean town car parks pointlessly. Finally I spoke to several owners who were selling because of running costs, so that was out.
  • Citroen Synergie / Peugeot 806 / Fiat Ulysse – So then we looked at the boxy shaped Ulysse, as it’s registered on the Reliability Index as a good score for an MPV (interestingly, the MPV style of car fairs pretty badly in terms of ownership problems, many suffering interior trim niggles). I must admit to always harbouring a liking for the design of this range of 3 (I say 3 as I have never ever seen the Lancia version on a UK road – have you?). The later versions were quite smart with body coloured lower sills, bumpers, trim and a host of electric extras. We Brits dislike the Fiat badge. It’s synonymous for flimsy build quality and cheap and cheerful cars, so the Ulysse seemed a good buy: it’s always £500+ less than the equivalent 806 Peugeot simply because of badge snobbery, as we know all three cars are built the same.
Finding a good one
I decided to ‘bite the bullet’ and drive a Synergie. I ruled out the 806 at this stage, because frankly if they are all the same car, I’m not prepared to pay extra for the words PEUGEOT on the front. So that week I searched and searched online for Synergie’s and Ulysse’s in my area, and dredged up some real junk I can tell you. This is where it’s a case of buyer beware: many of this model have done their time as a taxi, as you’ll no doubt be aware having seen them in service around your town after dark, filled with nightclubbers enjoying the cars quiet ride and composed road manners no doubt. Well, I was really fussy with my questions on the phone, and it saved me a heck of a lot of time going to physically see the cars. I asked ‘are there any holes on drilled on the dashboard’. If the seller said yes, I didn’t go any further – it’s a sure sign of either company car use (high miles, or hidden high mileage ie: clocked), or it’s been a taxi. Avoid! It will have been driven hard, and the interior will be worn out.
But that weekend in 2005 I extended my search, and found a silver Synergie for £4490.00 with 91k miles with FSH (full service history) out near Stonehenge, which is roughly one hour forty five minutes from Exeter. My budget wouldn’t stretch to less miles, but I was prepared to buy a higher mileage car based on condition; if it had been loved rather than abused, I’d buy it.
The dealer was a small trader, but up front about his business (usually a good sign) and described the car as ‘near mint’, which I took to mean good all round. Taking my Father as backup driver along with a fistful of dollars, I got a good feeling about the car from the off, but played it cool. I’d carefully picked a later model after finding the earlier cars (pre-facelift) were looking very tired now, and I had read a whole bunch of good stuff about the HDi common rail diesel unit fitted in this newer model. OK, I was pushing the budget, but if was going to keep it, and use it for clients, it needed to be right. And this one was.

And buying it
I noticed a little one pence coin size dent on each wing quite high up, a tiny spot of rust on the nearside sliding -door, but otherwise it was faultless. It ran sweetly, no smoke, revved well, climate control all worked, no funny warning lights, all dash lights worked (I’ve known dealers disconnect warning lights to hide problems like faulty ABS) and it drove well. Not like an Impreza, but good for the size of the car. It had all seven seats, the drivers’ was more worn than the the rest but that’s to be expected. We haggled, I challenged him on some service history points (I’ve also seen dealers make up entire service histories – always ring the garages phone number on the service stamps and have a chat), he said call the original garage, so I did, they sounded real and could vouch for the cars authenticity, he got a bit cross with me not trusting him, I wanted the car, I decided to trust him, we shook hands, we all smiled, job done.
And then I thought, this car’s so good, it deserves a blog….